Email this article 
(Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia, and National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan, R.O.C, Indonesia)(2) Pance Mariati
(Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractMaarif NU Educational Institution of Surabaya City houses several schools and there are still many teachers who do not understand theoretically and practically the policy of freedom of learning, even though the teacher's understanding of curriculum reform is very essential. Teachers find it difficult to implement a policy of fredom of learning at school and in the classroom. Teachers have difficulty in developing learning methods referring to independent learning. In addition, teachers have difficulty developing an fredom of learning curriculum (just curriculum transmitter). We provide training and mentoring to teachers for three meetings intensively. The result is an increase in teacher understanding in three aspects; (1), theoretically, (2), how to implement it, and (3), how to develop curriculum. This means that training and mentoring is very important to be carried out by more competent experts. This is in line with the research by Postholm (2012), which states that it is important for teacher training to be carried out by more competent people to increase teachers' understanding of the curriculum. Abstrak: Lembaga Pendidikan Maarif NU Kota Surabaya menaungi beberapa sekolah. Namun sumber daya manusia yang dimiliki masih terbatas serta fasilitas yang dimiliki juga masih relatif terbatas. Masih banyak guru yang belum memahami secara teoretis dan praktis kebijakan merdeka belajar padahal pemahaman guru terhadap reformasi kurikulum sangat esensial. Guru merasa kesulitan menerapkan kebijakan merdeka belajar di sekolah dan di kelas. Guru kesulitan dalam mengembangkan metode pembelajaran merujuk pada merdeka belajar. Selain itu guru kesulitan mengembangkan kurikulum merdeka belajar (curriculum transmitter). Kami memberikan pelatihan dan pendampingan kepada guru-guru selama tiga kali pertemuan dengan intensif. Hasilnya terjadi peningkatan pemahaman guru dalam tiga aspek; (1), secara teoretis, (2), bagaimana mengimplementasikannya, dan (3), bagaimana mengembangkan kurikulum. Artinya pelatihan dan pendampingan sangat penting dilakukan oleh para ahli yang lebih kompeten. Ini selaras dengan penelitian Postholm (2012), yang menyatakan bahwa pelatihan kepada guru penting dilakukan oleh orang yang lebih kompeten untuk peningkatan pemahaman guru terhadap kurikulum KeywordsKurikulum Merdeka Belajar; Sekolah Dasar; Guru; Pelatihan
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023371 |
Article metrics10.47679/ib.2023371 Abstract views : 3514 | PDF views : 2938 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Avalos, B. 2011. Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, no. 1: 10–20.
Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. D. (2014). Maximizing the potential of mentoring: A framework for pre-service teacher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(3), 224–239.
Burns, R. W., Jacobs, J., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2016). The changing nature of the role of the university supervisor and function of preservice teacher supervision in an era of clinically-rich practice. Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 410–425.
Buczynski, S., and C.B. Hansen. 2010. Impact of professional development on teacher practice: uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, no. 3: 599– 607.
Dobrowolska, K., & Balslev, K. (2017). Discursive mentoring strategies and interactional dynamics in teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 42, 10–20.
Inzer, L. D., & Crawford, C. B. (2005). A review of formal and informal mentoring: Processes, problems, and design. Journal of Leadership Education, 4(1), 31–50.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.
Kirk, D., & MacDonald, D. (2001). Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(5), 551-567, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270010016874.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002129.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002129
McMahon, M., J. Reeves, A. Devlin, J. Simpson, and A. Jaap. 2007. Evaluating the impact of chartered teachers in Scotland: The views of chartered teachers. Project Report. General Teaching Council Scotland, Edinburgh.
Neuschatz, M., McFarling, M., & White, S. (2008). Reaching the critical mass: The twenty-year surge in high school physics: Findings from the 2005 Nationwide Survey of High School Physics Teachers (Pub. No. R-442). College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/hs05report.pdf
Polikoff, M., Desimone, L., Porter, A., & Hochberg, E. (2015). Mentor policy and the quality of mentoring. The Elementary School Journal, 116, 76–102.
Park, M., & Sung, Y. K. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: What can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 15-33, https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756391
Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers’ professional development: A theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
Parise, L.M., and J.P. Spillane. 2010. Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal 110, no. 3: 323–46.
Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175.
Schwartz, D.L., and J.D. Bransford. 1998. A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction 16, no. 4: 475–522.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach and standards-based teaching reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 7(3), 481–546.Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Mustofa Mustofa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.