Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Research Articles
Accepted: 2023-02-10
Published: 2023-02-08

Sensory Integration Ability and Social Adjustment in Elementary School Students

Universitas Malahayati
Universitas Malahayati Lampung
psychological approach Sensori Integrasi Sensory Integration Social Adjustment Elementary School

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023) | Pages : 1-4

Statistics

Read: 628 | Download: 370

Crossmark and Dimension

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the sensory integration ability with social adjustment in elementary school students. The hypothesis used in this study was there a relationship between sensory integration ability with social adjustment in elementary school students. The subject in this study were 23 student at class IV Ubadah in SDIT X Bandar Lampung. The data of this study is taken by sensory integration and social adjustment scale with data analysis using Pearson product moment correlation analysis. The result showed that there was a significant relationship between sensory integration with social adjustment in elementary school students in SDIT X  Bandar Lampung at class IV Ubadah (r=0,676 with p>0,05). The relationship between the two variables is high, the higher the sensory integration ability,  the higher social adjustment ability would be.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara kemampuan sensori integrasi dengan penyesuaian sosial pada siswa sekolah dasar. Hipotesis yang digunakan adalah ada hubungan antara kemampuan sensori integrasi dengan penyesuaian sosial pada siswa sekolah dasar. Subyek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SDIT X  Bandar Lampung kelas IV Ubadah yang berjumlah 23 orang. Data penelitian ini diambil dengan menggunakan skala sensori integrasi dan skala penyesuaian sosial dengan analisis data menggunakan analisis korelasi product moment Pearson. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa ada hubungan yang signifikan antara sensori integrasi dengan penyesuaian sosial pada siswa sekolah dasar di SDIT X  kelas IV Ubadah (r=0,676 dengan p>0,05). Hubungan kedua variabel adalah tinggi, maka semakin tinggi kemampuan sensori integrasi maka semakin tinggi kemampuan penyesuaian sosial.

Introduction

Jen Ayres (Waiman, 2015) introduced sensory integration which is a process of human development by recognizing, changing and distinguishing sensations from the sensory system to then produce a response. One of the concepts of sensory integration theory is the drive for self-actualization which is then the most important part of individual development that stimulates children to explore without feeling tired and able to bring joy in facing challenges to achieve a goal. It is called internal motivation, but this is not found in children with sensory integration disorders (Benso, 20015).

According to the results of research by Van Den Oord et al (2002), states that the state of self, class, and school affects the social adjustment of children in their school. Children's adjustment at school includes how the child makes friends with peers, how the child obeys school rules, respects teachers, and others. This is related to whether the child will be accepted or rejected by their peers. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sensory integration on social adjustment in X Elementary School students in Bandar Lampung. In this study, the authors limit the variable of social adjustment of elementary school students (SD) which is defined as the ability of students to interact with other people and certain situations in the school environment.

According to Abraham (2002) in Addressing Learning Differences Sensory Integration Practical Strategies and Sensory Motor Activities for Used the Classroom describes that a child at the elementary school level cannot think comprehensively without going through certain stages of stimulation related to their age development. Activities that support gradual neural maturity are needed to prepare the child's brain structure. With the implementation of this stimulation, it is expected that children will be able to have perfect executive functions. The system is the first thing that must be given to provide influence for the development of the next stage in the form of sensory motor development, perceptual motor and the next stage in the form of cognitive or intellectual children.

In 1972, A. Jean Ayres introduced a model of human development known as sensory integration theory. According to Ayres' theory, SI occurs due to the influence of sensory inputs, including visual, auditory, tactile, vestibular and proprioceptive sensations. This process begins in the womb and enables the development of adaptive responses, which are the basis for developing more complex skills, such as language, emotional control, and arithmetic. Impairments in basic skills lead to difficulties in achieving higher skills. These impairments in sensory processing lead to a variety of functional and developmental problems, known as dysfunctions.

Methods

This research uses quantitative methods. The variables in this study are social adjustment as the dependent variable and sensory integration as the independent variable. The subjects in this study were 4th grade elementary school students at SDIT X in Bandar Lampung city. The sensory systems that become variables in this study are; movement/tactile, visual and auditory systems measured by a checklist table with direct observation and interviews. While for social adjustment is described in the way the child reacts and benefits to the child's environment which is measured using five characteristics of social adjustment in school from Schneiders, namely; Respectful and willing to accept existing rules, showing the best sense and participation in school activities, establishing good relationships with friends at school, being respectful of teachers, school leaders, and other staff and the fifth characteristic is helping the school to carry out its goals according to its function.

The analysis used in this study is Pearson's product moment correlation analysis. Product moment correlation or KPM developed by Karl (Hasan, 1999) is a statistical test tool used to test the associative hypothesis (relationship test) of two variables when the data is interval or ratio scale.

The KPM value is symbolized by r (rho). The KPM value is also between -1 < r < 1. If the r value = 0, it means that there is no correlation between the independent and dependent variables. The value of r = -1 means that there is a negative relationship between the independent and dependent variables. In other words, the "+" and "-" signs indicate the direction of the relationship between the variables being operationalized. In other words, the "+" and "-" signs indicate the direction of the relationship between the variables being operationalized. The following is a table of correlation values and the meaning of these values;

score Meaning
0,00 – 0,19 Very low
0,20 – 0,39 Low
0,40 – 0,59 Medium
0,60 – 0,79 Strong
0,80 – 1,00 Very Strong
Table 1. Meaning of Correlation Value Product moment

Results and Discussion

Calculation of the validity of the social adjustment scale items using the Pearson Product Moment correlation technique, namely by correlating the item score with the total aitem score then the author analyzes the data using the SPSS16.0 program and if the items that have a discrimination power index equal to or greater than 0, 30 the number exceeds the number of items planned to be used as a scale, then it can choose the items that have the highest discrimination power index, otherwise if the items that pass are still insufficient for the desired number, we can consider lowering the criterion limit of 0.30 to 0.25. (Azwar, 2013).

This study uses two scales, namely the sensory integration scale and the social adjustment scale. The validity test of the items can be explained in the table below:

No Aspec All Aitem Fall Aitem Aitem Valid Coefisien Correlation Aitem-total
1. Respect and acceptance of rules 6 2 4 0,710-0,792
2. Demonstrate a sense of excellence and participation in school activities 6 0 6 0,281-0,849
3. Establish a good relationship with friends at school 6 0 6 0,269-0,813
4. Be respectful to teachers, school leaders and other staff. 6 1 5 0,442-0,847
5 Assist the school to carry out its objectives in accordance with its functions 6 1 5 0,504-0,867
Amount 30 4 26 0,269-0,867
Table 2. Validity Test of Social Adjustment Scale

Based on the item analysis table on the social adjustment scale, 4 items were found to be canceled and 26 items were declared valid. The distribution of the aitem-total correlation coefficient (Corrected Item-Total Correlation), the social adjustment scale items move from (rbt) = 0.269 to (rbt) = 0.867 with a significance level of ?> 0.05. The validity of the social adjustment scale items shows that of the 30 items tested, 5 items were found to be canceled and 25 were declared valid.

Reliability calculations on the social adjustment scale using SPSS 16.0 found that the alpha reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.949. It can be said that the social adjustment scale can be said to be reliable and has a very good reliability value, the scale reliability coefficient of less than 0.6 is considered poor, the reliability coefficient of 0.7 is acceptable and above 0.8 is good (Priyatno, 2010).

Cases N % Cronbach’s Alpha N of Item
Valid 23 100,0 0,949 30
Excluded 0 0
Total 23 100,0
Table 3. Reliability of Social Adjustment Scale a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Adjustment

The research data can be described regarding the categorization of each research variable, the categorization used in this study is interval level categorization. Descriptive statistical data obtained empirical scores and hypothetical scores in detail.

Based on the results of the description analysis using the SPSS 23.0 application, it is known that the distribution of social adjustment scores is spread between 40 to 99.

Score Empiric Scor Hipotetic
Min Max Mean SD Min max mean SD
Social Adjusment 40 99 70,57 19,642 26 104 65 13
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics

Description:

  • The minimum score (Xmin) is the result of multiplying the number of scale items by the lowest value of the weighting of the answer choices.
  • The maximum score is the result of multiplying the number of scale items by the highest value of the weighting of the answer choices.
  • Hypothetical mean (µ) with the formula µ = number of items x center score.
  • The hypothetical standard deviation (?) is ? = (max score-min score: 6)

If the distribution of scores on each scale is grouped into value intervals, each interval representing a certain category, the following results are obtained:

Interval Frequency CategorY %
X <52 6 Low 26
52? X <78 6 Medium 26
78< X 11 High 48
Table 5. Descriptive Data of Social Adjustment

Based on the categorization of social adjustment scores above, it can be seen that the majority of the answers of all subjects from the social adjustment scale are in the high category, namely with a frequency of 11, a percentage of 48%, and a medium category with a frequency of 6, a percentage of 26% and low categorization which has a frequency of 6 with a percentage of 26%.

Interval Frequency CategorY %
24 – 30 4 Disorder 17,4
31 – 37 8 Not Integrated 34,8
38 – 42 11 Integrated 47,8
Table 6. Sensory Integration Categorization

Based on the categorization of sensory integration scores above, it can be seen that all subjects' answers from the scale are in the integrated category with a frequency of 11 and a percentage of 47.8%, the category is not integrated with a frequency of 8 and a percentage of 34.8%, and in the category of interference with a frequency of 4 and a percentage of 17.4%.

Social Adjustment Sensory Integration
Social Adjustment Correlation 1 0,676**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,000
N 23 23
Correlation 0,676** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,000
N 23 23
Table 7. Hypothesis Test

The results of the data analysis above, show a correlation coefficient value of 0.676 with a significance value of 0.000 where p <0.05, it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between sensory integration ability and social adjustment in SDIT X elementary school students. The correlation value of 0.676 shows that the two variables have a strong relationship.

Conclusion and Recommendation

Based on the results of research on sensory integration ability with social adjustment in elementary school students at SDIT X Bandar Lampung that has been conducted, and based on the results of the analysis and discussion previously described, it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between sensory integration ability with social adjustment in elementary school students at SDIT X Bandar Lampung. This conclusion is based on the hypothesis test conducted, obtained a correlation coefficient value of 0.676 with a significance value of 0.000 with a significance level of p = .0.05, it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between sensory integration ability and social adjustment in elementary school students at SDIT X Bandar Lampung and the relationship between the two variables can be stated as high. The results of the study conveyed that the higher the sensory ability of elementary school children at SDIT X Bandar Lampung, the higher their social adjustment ability.

References

A. Jean Ayres, Ph.D (1976). Sensory Integration and The Child. Western Psychological Services
Abraham, M. C. 2002. Addresing Learning Differences Sensory Integration Practical Strategies and Sensory Motor Activities for Use in the Classroom. McGraw-Hill Children’s Publishing. Michigan.
Adam Yahya, Agung Kurniawan, Ahmad Samawi (2015). Pengaruh Terapi Sensori Integrasi Terhadap Kemampuan Motorik Kasar Berjalan Di Atas Garis Siswa Autis. [Versi elektronik]. Jurnal Ortopedagogia, Volume 1, Nomor 4, Juli :2015325-329.
Bundy, A. C., Lane, S. J., and Murray, E.A. 2002. Sensory Integration Approach: Teori and Practice. 1nd. F.A. Davis Company. Philadelphia.
Desmita (2015). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Dokter Indonesia Online. Terapi Sensory ntegration untuk Anak Normal tapi Bermasalah. http://dokterindonesiaonline.com . 12 Desember 2023.
Dewi Sholikhah (2014). Penyesuaian Sosial Siswa Sd Negeri 1 Pedes Kelas V Pengguna Game Online. Skripsi Sarjana, tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Elina Waiman, Soedjatmiko, Hartono Gunardi, Rini Sekartini, Bernie Endyarni. Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Anak Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia, RS Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta.
F. J. Monks (2014). Psikologi Perkembangan Pengantar dalam Berbagai Bagiannya. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.
George S. Morrison (2015). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Saat Ini. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ika Sri Wahyuni (2009). Efektivitas Pemberian Permainan Tradisional Gobag Sodor Terhadap Penyesuaian Sosial Anak Sekolah Dasar Negeri Cakraningratan Surakarta. Skripsi Sarjana, tidak diterbitkan. Program Studi Psikologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Sukarta
Luara A. King (2010). Psikologi Umum Sebuah Pandangan Apresiatif. Jakarta. Salemba Humanika.
Renyep Proborini (2017). Workshop Deteksi Gangguan Perkembangan Anak & Penanganannya. Pidato disampaikan pada Workshop. Bandar Lampung. 5 Agustus 2017.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Susanto, A. 2016.Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Susanne Smith Roley (2002). Sensory Integration Theory Revisited. Copyrighted material by PRO-ED.Inc.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.
W. A Gerungan. (2004). Psikologi Sosial. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Yusuf, L N, Syamsu. (2000). Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.

Publisher’s Note

Utan Kayu Publishing maintains a neutral stance regarding territorial claims depicted in published maps and does not endorse or reject the institutional affiliations stated by the authors.

How to Cite

Junilia, E., & Dharmawan, A. K. (2023). Sensory Integration Ability and Social Adjustment in Elementary School Students. Nusantara Journal of Behavioral and Social Science, 2(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.47679/202321

Rights and Permissions

© The Author(s) 2023
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits others to share, adapt, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, even for commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Table of Content